Deprecated: Return type of LayerShifter\TLDExtract\Result::offsetExists($offset) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetExists(mixed $offset): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home/u404671710/domains/rollingnotes.in/public_html/news/application/third_party/domain-parser/layershifter/tld-extract/src/Result.php on line 189
Deprecated: Return type of LayerShifter\TLDExtract\Result::offsetGet($offset) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetGet(mixed $offset): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home/u404671710/domains/rollingnotes.in/public_html/news/application/third_party/domain-parser/layershifter/tld-extract/src/Result.php on line 203
Deprecated: Return type of LayerShifter\TLDExtract\Result::offsetSet($offset, $value) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetSet(mixed $offset, mixed $value): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home/u404671710/domains/rollingnotes.in/public_html/news/application/third_party/domain-parser/layershifter/tld-extract/src/Result.php on line 251
Deprecated: Return type of LayerShifter\TLDExtract\Result::offsetUnset($offset) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetUnset(mixed $offset): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home/u404671710/domains/rollingnotes.in/public_html/news/application/third_party/domain-parser/layershifter/tld-extract/src/Result.php on line 267
A PHP Error was encountered
Severity: 8192
Message: Return type of CI_Session_database_driver::open($save_path, $name) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::open(string $path, string $name): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
In a relief to contractors, Karnataka HC asks govt bodies to bear differential GST burden
In a relief to contractors, Karnataka HC asks govt bodies to bear differential GST burden
The dispute between contractors and government arose due to the entering of works contract before July 1, 2017, when the GST replaced the VAT regime. There were also situations where work was completed during VAT regime, but payments were made during the GST regime; contracts were entered during VAT regime but executed both during both VAT and GST regimes or bids were invited during the VAT regime but were finalised during the GST regime.
The dispute between contractors and government arose due to the entering of works contract before July 1, 2017, when the GST replaced the VAT regime. There were also situations where work was completed during VAT regime, but payments were made during the GST regime; contracts were entered during VAT regime but executed both during both VAT and GST regimes or bids were invited during the VAT regime but were finalised during the GST regime.
The dispute between contractors and government arose due to the entering of works contract before July 1, 2017, when the GST replaced the VAT regime. There were also situations where work was completed during VAT regime, but payments were made during the GST regime; contracts were entered during VAT regime but executed both during both VAT and GST regimes or bids were invited during the VAT regime but were finalised during the GST regime. 
